APQC -- How smart leaders leverage their experts
- N = 750+
- Increasing employee
competency is important
- Three goals: turning
mid-career to experts; getting novices to work independently; increasing
speed of knowledge creation
- "expert/nex'pert
gap" -- Lockheed Martin
- "Lumpiness" to
talent pool due to hiring/lay-off cycles
- Management can be induced to
delay retirement, thus delaying the crisis
- Strategies shaped by: nature
of the knowledge, nature of the work, nature of the teams
- "it has become a truism
to say that the amount of content is exploding. Deere, MITRE, Nalco, Baker
Hughes, and many others cited the challenge of dealing with an
overwhelming amount of data and information, housed in multiple locations,
and not tagged the same way."
- Four kinds of Knowledge:
- Technical teams present
unique challenges:
- Low tolerance for what is
perceived as administrative
- Rookies hesitate to bother
senior experts with what may be trivial questions or nuisances
- Work force expectations are
changing
- "Most organizations do
not have enough expert trainers and mentors to bring nex'perts up to
speed, nor do they have the years to wait for training and mentoring
programs to achieve their full effect."
- Lockheed Martin uses
"Fellows" -- the top 1% of technical expert. Any program can
request a Fellow for short-term consultation, technical/risk review,
evaluate program direction, assist with problem solving. Employees can
also directly tap Fellows.
- Fellows collaborate via
conferences and forums.
- Standardization of processes
with checklists, etc. is also valuable
- NASA communities are led by a
"technical fellow. Oversight responsibility includes:
- Serving as technical experts
- Chartering and leading teams
- Serving as independent
resources
- Levying standards and specs
- Conducting workshops and
conferences to promote discipline awareness
- Serving as stewards
- Foster consistency is
creation and maintenance of agency-level standards and specs
- Leading working groups
- Ensuring that lessons
learned are identified and incorporated
- Fostering participation in
external initiatives
- Expertise location is
important
- Best approach is
profile-based experience combined with CoP, discussion forums, and collab
sites. Import as much data as possible from HR and other systems
- Knowledge Capture can be
formal and top-down or it could be user-driven. Wipro, for example, lets
users self-identify and then validates expertise based on responses.
- There's some discussion of
Kraft's MASK approach
- "A rich collection of
well-structured, easily accessible content helps less experienced people
get up to speed and reduces the burden on experts to answer common
questions."
- Lockheed Martin encourages
sharing of content "in the least restrictive environment
possible"
- Schlumberger makes extensive
use of its special library
- Using knowledge is a
particular challenge. You need to get experts together to work on it.
- LM Fellows attend a
conference every 12-18 months and they can bring "rising technical
talent" as their guests
- Schlumberger brings HR and IT
together:
- Defined competencies for
each position with assessment for identifying gaps
- Knowledge case management
system with live support
- "Eureka" CoPs with
bulletin boards, webinars, and F2F workshops
- "Career Network
Profiles" -- resumes to facilitate expertise location
- "Tellus" program
-- special library program with journals, librarians, etc.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home